Opinion & Essay

Plagued by Shipbuilding Missteps, Navy Will Struggle To Meet Future Threats

June 5, 2021Carl Forsling
Sailors aboard the aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford prepare to get underway Oct. 25, 2019. US Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Michael Botts, courtesy of DVIDS.

Sailors aboard the aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford prepare to get underway Oct. 25, 2019. US Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Michael Botts, courtesy of DVIDS.

As the US National Defense Strategy seeks to counter China’s influence in the Indo-Pacific region and address future threats to trade routes that the US and world economy depend on, the US Navy has a lot of challenges ahead. 

Infantry and tanks can’t protect maritime trade, so this should be a sizable opportunity for the sea service to reassert its dominance after largely serving in a support role during 20 years of land warfare. The Navy’s most famous component might be its SEAL teams, but they make up a minuscule portion of the sea service’s total end strength.

For two decades, the Navy has made major missteps in its shipbuilding, causing concern about the service’s ability to become the keystone of American strategy. These haven’t been small mistakes, either. They’ve been made in combatant vessels, those meant to be part of a robust fighting fleet. Instead, the new ships are floating monuments to lost opportunities.

Littoral Combat Ships

The littoral combat ships USS Tulsa, foreground, USS Manchester, middle, and USS Independence, background, sail in formation in the eastern Pacific Ocean on Feb. 27, 2019. US Navy photo by Chief Mass Communication Specialist Shannon Renfroe.

Officially known as the LCS and unofficially mocked as the “Little Crappy Ship,” littoral combat ships began in 2004 with a program goal of 55 vessels. Nearly one in six Navy ships was supposed to be an LCS — a plan devised under a fundamental misreading of long-term trends. The LCS was supposed to be able to operate close to shore and in confined waters such as the Persian Gulf. 

What it ended up being was a boat the size of a capital ship with the speed of a Jet Ski watercraft and the armament of a patrol boat. The ships were supposed to have swappable mission modules to allow each LCS to optimize as necessary for mine countermeasures, surface warfare, or anti-submarine missions. But those modules have taken more than 15 years to materialize. Only now are littoral combat ships fielding the Naval Strike Missile, and thus any capability to engage over the horizon, an important capability when your vessel is essentially unarmored and has a minimal crew for damage control.

But the real nail in the coffin for the LCS is its reliability. Both classes of the LCS have repeatedly suffered engineering casualties during routine operations that have left them limping and sometimes being towed into port, even without an enemy to worry about. Four virtually new ships are targeted for retirement in 2022, and the program is being truncated at 35 ships, far short of the original program of record.

The Zumwalt-Class Destroyer 

The USS Zumwalt passes under the Chesapeake Bay Bridge as the ship travels to its home port of San Diego on Oct. 17, 2016. US Navy photo by Liz Wolter.

The LCS was a significant misfire. The Navy tried to incorporate the littoral warfare flavor of the month and discovered it tasted like OJ and toothpaste. Providing naval fire support ashore has been a core competency of the Navy’s since its inception. When the DD-21 program morphed into the DD(X) and finally into the DDG-1000 series of Zumwalt-class destroyers, fire support was the centerpiece of the design.

Each DDG-1000 has two Advanced Gun Systems, which include 155 mm cannons able to fire Long Range Land Attack Projectiles over 80 miles. That emphasis on guns was a significant departure from the gradual but inexorable decline of naval guns since the end of World War II. Unfortunately, as the planned number of Zumwalts shrank, the cost of the ammunition rose to north of $800,000 a round. This resulted in the cancellation of ammunition purchases to the point where the guns now are basically expensive decorations, and the Navy is looking for ways to fill the space.

The problem with the guns on the Zumwalts reflects problems with the class itself and with advanced weapons more generally. The unknowns associated with new technology result in cost overruns, which mean cuts in quantities to stay within budget. Those cuts mean that development costs are spread over smaller numbers of platforms, and economies of scale are impossible on the remaining ones.

Originally, 32 destroyers in the Zumwalt class were to be built. The ship incorporates unique stealth features, an unusual hull type, turbine-electric drive, and several weapons and sensors different from any other Navy vessel. As costs escalated, the class was cut to just three ships, and the capabilities of those three were scaled back as well. As the program proceeds, more compromises likely will be made as the costs of maintaining orphan designs increase with age.

Ford-Class Aircraft Carrier

The USS Gerald R. Ford turns into the James River as it gets underway Oct. 25, 2019. US Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Tatyana Freeman.

The namesake ship of the class, the USS Gerald R. Ford, hasn’t even begun operational deployments, but it has already endured a long, strange trip. The carrier is 30% over budget as of this writing.

If it were only the budget at issue, this would be an open-and-shut case of Pentagon overruns, but the Ford is pioneering several new technologies. Most famously, it incorporates the Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System (EMALS), a Maglev-like device to accelerate planes for takeoff, replacing the venerable steam system incorporated in earlier carriers. Unfortunately, a 2020 analysis by the head of Navy operational testing showed that EMALS was failing after only 181 launches, far short of the 4,166-launch system requirement.

The carrier has had similar issues with its highly automated ordnance elevators. After an arduous process, four of its 11 elevators still aren’t fully ready as the ship heads out to shock trials this summer. By missing those trials, the Navy may never know whether those systems, critical to the ship’s fighting ability, can withstand the stresses of combat.

These issues should not be a surprise. The ship was procured in 2008 and commissioned in 2017. More importantly, even after going through all this trouble, the survivability of carriers and their relatively short-legged aircraft in the future is still the subject of much debate. At minimum, the Navy is seriously considering a greater role for what might be called light carriers, or CVLs. The Navy might finally fix its next-generation carrier just in time for the requirements to change once again.

Navy Central to Future Conflict

The difficulties of the littoral combat ships and the Zumwalt and Ford classes wouldn’t be so troubling if the Navy wasn’t so critical in almost any conceivable vision of future conflict with China. As it stands, the Navy has been severely challenged in building a fleet capable of meeting that threat. 

Other services, such as the Army, haven’t been immune to acquisition mistakes. The Future Combat Systems and Comanche scout helicopter come to mind. But ships are fundamentally different than individual weapons, land vehicles, and even aircraft. The development of naval systems is lengthy, but the construction of a new ship takes years, and each one is expected to last decades. 

Complicating this calculation: The technology available when a ship is first conceived will be two or more decades obsolete by the time the vessel actually is launched. Betting on emerging technology that never fully pans out is nearly as dangerous. Navies are stuck with their mistakes far longer than land forces.

This makes the US Navy’s decisions during the next few years even more critical than most. The US is counting on the Navy to be the foundation of deterrence. The sea service needs to set a sustainable, low-risk course forward — or that foundation will crack. The Navy must do a much better job of designing a fleet in the next 30 years than it has over the last 20.

Read Next: We Must Revisit Tarawa Amid the Marine Corps’ Renewed Focus on Amphibious Warfare

Carl Forsling
Carl Forsling
Carl Forsling is a retired Marine Corps aviator who has also served as a police helicopter pilot and currently works in the aerospace industry. He is a graduate of the University of Pennsylvania and lives in the Dallas-Fort Worth area.
More from Coffee or Die Magazine
US Launches Airstrikes in Syria After Drone Kills US Worker

While it’s not the first time the U.S. and Iran have traded airstrikes in Syria, the attack and the ...

March 24, 2023Associated Press
The Gift jason dunham
‘The Gift’ Explores the Life and Legacy of Medal of Honor Recipient Jason Dunham

"The Gift" tells the story of the first Marine to receive the Medal of Honor after the Vietnam War. ...

March 24, 2023Mac Caltrider
uss milius
US Denies Chinese Claim It Drove Away American Destroyer

The U.S. Navy's 7th Fleet said that a statement from China's Southern Theatre Command that it had fo...

March 23, 2023Associated Press
The Speed Project: Vet Team To Run in Lawless, Invite-Only Ultramarathon

For the first time, a team of (mostly) US veterans and active-duty service members will run in The S...

March 23, 2023Jenna Biter
uranium-based ammo ammunition Ukraine UK depleted uranium
A Look At the Uranium-Based Ammo the UK Will Send to Ukraine

The British defense ministry on Monday confirmed it would provide Ukraine with armor-piercing rounds containing depleted uranium.

March 23, 2023Associated Press
Zaporizhzhia Ukraine Russia
Ukraine: Russia Hits Apartments and Dorm, Killing Civilians

“Russia is shelling the city with bestial savagery,” President Volodymyr Zelenskyy wrote in a Telegr...

March 22, 2023Associated Press
cold brew coffee soda float
The Bitter Barista's Cold Brew Coffee Soda Float

Today, we combine the best of both worlds with this indulgent recipe, smashing together our love of coffee and ice cream with a cold brew coffee soda float!

March 21, 2023Heather Lynn
abrams tanks ukraine
US Speeds Up Abrams Tank Delivery to Ukraine War Zone

The original plan was to send Ukraine 31 of the newer M1A2 Abrams, which could have taken a year or ...

March 21, 2023Associated Press
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Careers
Contact Us
  • Request a Correction
  • Write for Us
  • General Inquiries
© 2023 Coffee or Die Magazine. All Rights Reserved